On CBS.com: Christine maybe a racist
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 6th, 2008

Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 1:08 pm

Categories: Corporate strategy, Legal, Linux

Tags: OSI, Open Source Initiative, Microsoft Corp., Sandcastle, Open Source, Mary Jo Foley

After outcry from various constituencies over the past couple of days, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and conditions required in order to be qualify as bona-fide open source.

Sandcastle is a documentation compiler for managed class libraries that was labeled as being available under the Microsoft Permissive License, one of two Open Source Initiative-approved licenses under which Microsoft provides access to its source code.

Sam Ramji, head of Microsoft’s open-source and Linux team, posted an apology on behalf of Microsoft to the OSI to the Microsoft Port 25 blog on June 6. He also said, per his instruction, Sandcastle was unpublished, effective immediately, from Microsoft’s CodePlex code-repository site. If and when th SandCastle team agrees to publish the source code, the project might be reposted in the future, Ramji said.

From Ramji’s blog post:

“A number of people have alerted me in the last 24 hours that a Microsoft project called Sandcastle, located on Codeplex, used the Ms-PL and called itself ‘open source’ yet never posted the source code.

“This is unacceptable and represents a violation of Microsoft’s Open Source policy. I take it extremely seriously….

“I apologize to the OSI on behalf of Microsoft for this mistake.”

When I first heard rumblings over Sandcastle licensing earlier this week, I was doubtful Microsoft was willing to risk the wrath of the OSI over a documentation  compiler. It’s good to see Ramji & Co. do the right thing here.

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 57 Talkback(s)
OpenSUSE is a free download, but that's not the point of Free Software.
http://www.novell.com/products/opensuse/downloads/index.html
http://en.opensuse.org/Welcome_to_openSUSE.org

The GPL, which GNU/Linux is licensed under*, doesn't require them to offer a free ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: BlueG Posted on: 07/03/08 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
who do they think they are fooling?  Linux Geek | 06/06/08
Thanks  crypt2121 | 06/09/08
and .... "Sam Ramji, head of Microsofts open-source and Linux team"  fr0thy2 | 06/09/08
The point of CodePlex is???  storm14k | 06/06/08
Lots of OSS for Windows  sysop-dr | 06/09/08
Missed something  seanferd | 06/09/08
Give me a break !  ghost_ghost | 06/10/08
Troll  bmerc | 06/10/08
Re  ghost_ghost | 06/11/08
You! Give "Me" a break!  ajv123 | 06/10/08
Re  ghost_ghost | 06/11/08
Please provide question for this answer: I don't develope ANYTHING!  Ole Man | 06/10/08
Re  ghost_ghost | 06/11/08
It works better  Ole Man | 06/11/08
Amen to THAT:  XweAponX | 06/10/08
Yeah ... profit is bad???  dan@... | 06/09/08
"Greed Is...Good...."  drprod@... | 06/09/08
Reading Comprehension For The Win  bmerc | 06/10/08
This is something new?  Ole Man | 06/06/08
Respectable corporation?  klumper | 06/07/08
Again, it depends on what the definition of "is" is  Ole Man | 06/07/08
Well spoken  ajv123 | 06/10/08
M$ spokemen will say ANYTHING  jns_45K@... | 06/11/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  johnwsaundersiii@... | 06/09/08
Is ZDNet being used to distribute illegal software?  RamonFHerrera | 06/09/08
apology or a response to being found out in NOT showing source code?  pessimist | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  Tiquor | 06/09/08
exactly.  merc2dogs` | 06/10/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  jducoeur | 06/09/08
Open Source for Windows  RamonFHerrera | 06/09/08
open source project for java  atari8bit@... | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  ctalk@... | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  ePM360 | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  bern1304 | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  atari8bit@... | 06/09/08
Another IPX moment for Novell; underground IBM patents.  rtirman37@... | 06/09/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  sdchargers13 | 06/09/08
And this is new, how?  kraterz | 06/09/08
I just applied for a job at microsoft with a build team and..  pcguy777 | 06/09/08
And Linux zealots ranting on every MS blog is new? How?  transposeIT | 06/09/08
Time to spare yes, coz of Linux  Web Smart | 06/09/08
Wow...  ledbylies@... | 06/10/08
Touchy feely MS  bass_lardy | 06/10/08
Microsoft Open Sores  whisperycat | 06/10/08
Bingo!  ajv123 | 06/10/08
Oohh gosh, you're special, you knowz teh ingish  bmerc | 06/10/08
"Those who live in glass houses..."  Q'sDad | 06/17/08
Time to spare yes, coz of Linux ?  ghost_ghost | 06/10/08
Sounds like Vista  ajv123 | 06/10/08
I'd have to be a ghost, too  Ole Man | 06/10/08
Re  ghost_ghost | 06/11/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  notsofast | 06/10/08
Trolz to the left of me, Flamerz to the right. Stuck in the middle (NT)  invmgr@... | 06/10/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  as901 | 06/11/08
RE: Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation  JamesDoyle | 06/14/08
Suse Libux from N ovell going the same way!  vmeck@... | 06/30/08
OpenSUSE is a free download, but that's not the point of Free Software.  BlueG | 07/03/08

What do you think?

12 Trackbacks

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/wp-trackback.php?p=1433

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    After outcry from various constituencies over the past couple of days, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and conditions required in order to be qualify as bona-fide ...

    Trackback by KezNews.com - Windows portal - News — June 7, 2008 @ 12:22 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    Interesting article over on ZDNet. I don’t know what surprised me more, “Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation” or to hear Microsoft actually has a “open-source and Linux team”. ...

    Trackback by SHOCM — June 9, 2008 @ 4:22 am

  • The real SandCastle’s (and Microsoft’s) problem
    Mary Jo Foley reports that Microsoft had pulled a project called SandCastle from CodePlex for not publishing the source code as required. It is not surprising to me that someone posted something claiming to be open source but isn’t. ...

    Trackback by cybertech Rambler — June 9, 2008 @ 11:24 am

  • Sandcastle project removed from Codeplex
      We have removed Sandcastle project from Codeplex after carefully evaluating the feedback from this thread http://www.codeplex.com/Sandcastle/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=29085  (currently unavailable) . There are few options such as the following:

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 10, 2008 @ 3:20 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative
    After outcry from various constituencies, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and conditions required in order to be qualify as bona-fide open source. ...

    Trackback by webspherepower Magazine — June 10, 2008 @ 7:18 pm

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    said, per his instruction, Sandcastle was unpublished, effective immediately, from Microsoft’s CodePlex code-repository site. If and when th SandCastle team agrees to publish the source code, the project might be reposted in the future, Ramji said. Full Story

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 26, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft dumps Sandcastle, does right by open source
    When I texted Sam Ramji to let him know about Sandcastle, and he quickly texted back that he would look into it, I figured that a) it hadn’t yet hit anyone’s radar at Microsoft and b) that he’d fix it. Fix it, he did. As Mary Jo Foley notes, it was “doubtful [that] Microsoft was willing to risk the wrath of the OSI over a documentation compiler.” I’d go one step further. Once alerted to Sandcastle’s violation and to the importance thereof, it was doubtful that Microsoft

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 26, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation" or to hear Microsoft actually has a "open-source and Linux team". Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 26, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative
    After outcry from various constituencies, Microsoft has pulled from its CodePlex site its Sandcastle project for failure to comply with the terms and...

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 28, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    Sandcastle is a documentation compiler for managed class libraries that was labeled as being available under the Microsoft Permissive License, one of two Open Source Initiative-approved licenses under which Microsoft provides access to its source code. Full Article

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 28, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft apologizes to Open Source Initiative for policy violation
    When I first heard rumblings over Sandcastle licensing earlier this week, I was doubtful Microsoft was willing to risk the wrath of the OSI over a documentation  compiler. It’s good to see Ramji & Co. do the right thing here.   Source : http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1433

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 28, 2008 @ 3:07 am

  • Microsoft dumps Sandcastle, does right by open source
    When I texted Sam Ramji to let him know about Sandcastle, and he quickly texted back that he would look into it, I figured that a) it hadn’t yet hit anyone’s radar at Microsoft and b) that he’d fix it. Fix it, he did. As Mary Jo Foley notes, it was “doubtful [that] Microsoft was willing to risk the wrath of the OSI over a documentation compiler.” I’d go one step further. Once alerted to Sandcastle’s violation and to the importance thereof, it was doubtful that Microsoft

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 28, 2008 @ 3:07 am

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

Storage Virtualization

  • In virtual environments, storage matters. It influences everything from application availability and disaster readiness to power consumption and TCO. Bottom line: Don’t defeat the purpose of your consolidation by skimping on storage.
  • From our sponsors
  • EMC Corporation
  • ESG applauds new CX4 in analyst report According to ESG, it's hard to find much missing in the new CLARiiON CX4. Read the report to learn more »
advertisement
Click Here